Senses: Smelling

Your Sense of Smell

The following is excerpted from A Primer on Smell.

Smell “gives us information about place, about where we are,” says Randall Reed, a well-known Hopkins neuroscientist whose specialty is the sense of smell. And smell tells us about people. “Whether we realize it or not, we collect a lot of information about who is around us, based on smell,” says Reed. And about food.

Odors can also warn of trouble–spoiled food and leaking gas (today), cave bears (once), or fire (any eon)–even at a distance. “It’s a great alerter,” offers Donald Leopold, a Hopkins otolaryngologist. “If someone lights a cigar three offices down, you know it right away.”

Smell can also evoke remarkably intense emotion, just with a simple scent. Music stimulates emotion, too, but it typically takes an entire symphony or song to make anyone burst into tears. … Say the smell is purple petunias, which have a rich spiciness no other petunia has, and say your mother died when you were 3. You wouldn’t need to identify the smell, or to have conscious memories of your mother or her garden, to feel sad when that sweet tang drifts up to the porch.

Smell in that broad sense is thought to be ancient, because its fundamental structures are similar in species all the way from fish to moths to primates. In all species, chemical receptors do their work in a fluid medium (mucus for human smell), as would be expected if this sense formed in primeval seas. All smell receptors are self-renewing (practical, since they’re exposed to the world at large, including toxins). And all smell receptors report directly to the brain (in primates to the old part of the cortex), without intervening synapses in the thalamus.

Compared with other mammals, how well do people detect smells?

That depends what you mean by ‘how well.’ We are low on receptors: Current estimates say that humans have roughly five million olfactory receptor cells, about as many as a mouse. A rat has some 10 million, a rabbit 20 million, and a bloodhound 100 million.

“Across species, there is a relatively good correlation between the number of receptor cells and olfactory acuity,” says Reed. “You can hardly find the olfactory bulb in a human brain–it’s a pea-sized object. In a mouse, it’s a little bigger. It’s bean- sized in a rat, about the size of your little finger in a rabbit, and the size of your thumb in a bloodhound.”

While we may not have the olfactory range of other creatures, the receptors we do have are as sensitive as those of any animal. Several recent papers indicate that humans are capable, at least in experimental conditions, of smelling a single molecule. If so, in that sense not even a bloodhound could hope to do better.

We can also think, making conscious (and successful) efforts to sort smells out. A trained ‘Nose,’ a professional in the perfumery business, can name and distinguish some 10,000 odors. Reed says that a master perfumer can sniff a modern scent that has a hundred different odorants in it, go into the lab, and list the ingredients. “In a modest amount of time, he comes back with what to you or me would smell like a perfect imitation of that perfume. It’s amazing.” Similarly, using smell alone, trained wine tasters can tell you a wine’s alcohol content, year of production, grape variety, and even the district in which the grapes were grown.

While a few people do have a dramatically better sense of smell, most of us probably just don’t pay attention. ‘Noses’ say that their abilities are a matter of training, in which the important thing is to practice, to make the distinctions conscious, and to attach words to each one. That makes sense, given the acute sense of smell found in the few remaining aboriginal peoples of the world, for whom smell remains a matter of survival.

Physically, how does the sense of smell work?

Smell receptors in the innermost parts of the nose bond to gas molecules from the air. The receptors then send electrical signals to the olfactory bulb, which signals the orbitofrontal cortex, where the firing pattern reveals to the rest of the brain what smells so nice (or bad) out there. Most receptors (though not all, according to preliminary research in Don Leopold’s lab) are arrayed in two dime-sized patches, one per nostril.

The genetics and biochemistry of the system are a hot field of study, and much of what’s known is new. The first gene for a smell receptor was discovered as recently as 1991, by a team from Columbia. That triumph broke the subject wide open.

Several hundred receptors sounds like a lot, except that the world has thousands and thousands of different odors. How can we distinguish so many?

Because we don’t need a special receptor for each individual odor. Current thinking holds that each receptor type bonds to one or several specific molecules, according to shape. Researchers often describe the system in terms of locks and keys, because only the right odorant will unlock the receptor. The fit must be precise even to the molecule’s handedness.

For instance, a left-handed carvone molecule smells like spearmint, while its right-handed twin smells like caraway seeds. Clearly, right- and left-handed versions fit different receptors, therefore send along different signals (as is also true of smell in other animals and bacteria).

Receptors mostly overlap, many of them responding to the same odorants. Researchers infer that from their work with specific anosmias, conditions in which people cannot smell some particular substance because they lack the receptors–which is most likely if the receptor is coded by only one gene. No gene, no receptor, no smell.

But there are only about 30 such anosmias, which means there must be many thousands of smells that are handled either by many receptors, or by combinations of receptors. These are the smells any person with normal olfaction can detect. Reed says, “Take phenyl ethyl alcohol, which smells like rose. If there are 10 different receptors that all detect some level of phenyl ethyl alcohol, you will not find people who cannot smell rose. I’m certainly not aware of any.”

Two people may not perceive a scent in the same way, though. Because we all have different genes, including genes for smell receptors, we each have our own combination of receptors, including those for phenyl ethyl alcohol. Each combination makes a different firing pattern in the brain–but we all call it ‘rose.’ (Well, sort of. This chemical is the ‘rose’ in drugstore perfume.)

Complex aromas, like a genuine rose or the rose-scented perfume Joy, consist of many different odorant molecules. Therefore they trigger a variety of receptors, giving each of us a unique firing pattern that we can recognize, and name, with practice.

Do we pick up odors equally from both nostrils?

Surprise! Maybe not, according to preliminary, unpublished research by Leopold. He and his team took CAT scans of 90 patients who said they had lost their sense of smell in either the right or left nostril. The scans showed, however, that regardless of which nostril was supposedly affected, a significant number of patients had anatomical obstructions in the left nostril and the left nostril only.

“What we took this to mean,” says Leopold, “was that the majority of these 90 patients were using only the left side of their noses, [at least while their smell was being tested]. They were ignoring their right nostril.”

Do most people have one dominant nostril, then, just as most are right-handed? “That’s the logical leap we’d like to make,” admits Leopold. But the data aren’t there yet.

Why is it that even an overwhelming odor–except garlic– seems to go away after a few minutes?

The system adapts, primarily through a biochemical mechanism discovered by King-Wai Yau, a neuroscientist at the medical school: Calcium cations enter the olfactory receptors and prevent them from sending signals. “Essentially, they turn down the volume,” says Reed.

All senses have variations on the theme, ways to damp stimuli, and a good thing, too. We’ve all had times, such as cleaning up after a child vomits, when that damper is essential. Or imagine walking from a shadowed doorway into sunlight, which can be more than a millionfold brighter–yet we’re only dazzled for a few seconds, because our eyes adjust so quickly.

From A Primer on Smell

Research also shows that like our hands, we may have a dominant nostril!

Smell & the Root Chakra

Smell is associated with the root (1st) chakra, which governs self-preservation, vitality, heredity and identification with the physical body. Covering such innate concepts, it is no wonder our sense of smell is our most primitive sense and the first to awaken upon birth.

Fun Facts

If your sniffer is at peak performance, you can distinguish 4,000-10,000 different smells! Even so, bloodhounds can smell a range of odors 1,000 times better than humans.

Sometimes people with head injuries experience ‘phantom smells’ that no one else experiences. This is often due to injured nerve fibers, which lucky can grow back with a little guidance and luck.

Compiled fun facts about all the senses

Continued Learning

Super great content made for curious birds without a science background. Seriously, read up!

A Primer on Smell – Johns Hopkins Magazine

In Short: Taste & Smell – Johns Hopkins Magazine

Smells & Nostalgia – BBC Science & Nature: Human Mind & Body

Sniffing the Decades – BBC Science & Nature: Human Mind & Body

The Nose Knows – Neuroscience for Kids

Smell – BBC Science & Nature: Human Mind & Body

Chakras Chart: shows corresponding sense, area of consciousness, color vibration, musical vibration, gland, nerve and system of the body and element – The Brofman Foundation for the Advancement of Healing

5 thoughts on “Senses: Smelling

  1. Your account of the number of smell receptors varies wildly from other sources, which place humans at 12 to 40 million and dogs at 1 to 4 billion. When you’re making statements of fact that differ from the norm, you might consider referencing your source material.

  2. Hey thanks bukmacher. More to come indeed, some by spring and more by summer…

    Hi Leonard. Sincere thanks for making me aware science has progressed in this arena. Cool! It certainly makes sense we’re keener about being keener…

    By the way, I did more than consider referencing my source material, I linked it in the first sentence. Elise Hancock wrote A Primer on Smell for Johns Hopkins [University] Magazine in 1996.

    It’s been my intention to update the sense pages and put them more into my own words, so I will work on this one first. Promises for updated content (and context) before summer is upon us..

    And hey, if you (or anyone) cares to post excellent reference links here that could support a sound report of common sense and emerging holistic theory with their respective topics, that would be pretty amazingly lovely.
    Cheers!

  3. kim says:

    my mom recently suffered a head injury and has since lost her sense of smell….a friend of mine told me about a grid or chart that has 50 or so scents that can be used to improved or even regain some of the olfactory senses. Any idea what this is or where we can buy it?

  4. Hi Kim,
    Sorry to hear about your mom, and happy to hear you are exploring sensory integration exercise to help her out. That’s just good for you both.

    I do not know about the chart you are referencing but I recommend the Vocabulary of Odor kits to wake up her senses and teach concrete paths to conscious discernment. There is a Basic 7 and an Advanced 28… Here is a link to Jeanne Rose’s products page:

    http://www.jeannerose.net/products.html#basic7

    I suggest getting a Basic 7 kit, as depending upon the severity of her injury it could be frustrating to start with the Advanced. Once you’ve got it, consider contacting me for a skype or gmail video session for assistance in how to get the most out of the process. We can make it fun and interesting for her, at her pace!

    Thanks for your question and thank you for loving your loved one <3

Leave a Reply